symposium THEme

                Human Genome Project is largely complete, so the problem facing by scientists is how to maximize the use of the newly acquired data for improving health care. It is estimated that the number of therapeutic targets available for drug discovery will increase from the current number of 600 to 1000 to perhaps as many as 5000 to 10,000. In addition to the challenges that this number provides to the pharmaceutical industry, there is the issue of sequence variation through Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), some of which may impact upon the way that the body handles drug treatment. This may be due to a direct effect on the binding site of the protein target through non-conservative alterations of the amino acid sequence, or else through indirect effects on drug metabolizing enzymes. In order to meet these challenges, the combination of structural proteomics and computer-aided small molecule design provides opportunities for creating new molecules in silico; these may be designed to bind to selected pharmacogenetic variants of a protein in order to overcome the non-responsiveness of certain patient groups to a particular medicine.
                
In silico drug discovery methods reduce both time and cost of development of novel drug/lead molecules. Knowledge about the molecule, its interaction with the drug, molecular modeling, and new drug development creates an awareness of the molecule at the organ level and aids in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. Computational tools have the advantage of delivering new lead candidates more quickly and at lower cost. In the 21st century, in silico methods facilitate target identification, structure prediction and lead/drug discovery. The computational methods expect more reliable and expeditious protocols for development of novel ideas, which increase the potential leads. The computer-assisted molecular design has succeeded in the QSAR and protein modeling algorithms to improve activity of lead compounds. Selecting candidates via the described in silico virtual screening, should help to reduce the list of candidate molecules and thereby reduce time and costs significantly.
For further more enquiry email us to bioinfoau@gmail.com
Plenary Speakers
  • Dr. U. Deva Priyakumar
    International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad
  • Dr. K. Gunasekaran
    University of Madras, Chennai
  • Dr. J. Jeyakanthan
    Alagappa University, Karaikudi
  • Dr. R. Krishna
    Pondicherry University, Puducherry
  • Dr. S. Krishnaswamy
    Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai
  • Dr. M. Michael Gromiha
    Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai
  • Dr. S. Parthasarthy
    Bharthidasan University, Trichy
  • Dr. Prasad A. Wadegaonkar
    Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati
  • Dr. Ritushree Kukreti
    Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi
  • Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh
    Alagappa University, Karaikudi
  • Dr. N. Sundara Baalaji
    Bharathiar University, Coimbatore
  • Dr. Sunil Kumar
    Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar
  • Dr. M. Suresh Kumar
    Pondicherry University, Puducherry
  • Dr. K. Thangaraj
    Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology, Hyderabad
  • Dr. D. Velmurugan
    University of Madras, Chennai
  • Mr. R. Raghu
    Schrodinger, USA


External Links